Scope and objectives
This Auditing standard discusses the importance of planning an audit of financial statements and outlines the responsibilities of the auditor in this regard. The purpose of planning is to ensure that the audit is performed in an effective and efficient manner. Adequate planning can help the auditor to identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis, devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit, and properly organize and manage the audit engagement.
The planning process involves establishing an overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan. The nature and extent of planning activities will vary depending on factors such as the size and complexity of the entity being audited, previous experience with the entity, and changes in circumstances that occur during the audit engagement.
Planning is not a one-time event but is a continual and iterative process that often begins shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit and continues until the completion of the current audit engagement. As part of the planning process, the auditor needs to consider the timing of certain activities and audit procedures that need to be completed prior to the performance of further audit procedures.
For example, prior to identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement, the auditor needs to consider matters such as the analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures, obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity, and determining materiality. The auditor may also need to involve experts and perform other risk assessment procedures.
While the auditor may discuss elements of planning with the entity’s management, the overall audit strategy and the audit plan remain the auditor’s responsibility. The auditor needs to be careful not to compromise the effectiveness of the audit when discussing matters included in the overall audit strategy or audit plan. For example, discussing the nature and timing of detailed audit procedures with management may make the audit procedures too predictable and compromise their effectiveness.
In conclusion, the objective of planning an audit of financial statements is to ensure that the audit is performed in an effective and efficient manner. This SA 300 is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 1st April 2008.
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members
The involvement of the engagement partner and other key members of the audit team is critical in the planning process for several reasons. These team members have a deep understanding of the client’s business and the industry in which they operate, which makes their insights invaluable in developing an effective audit plan. Their experience can help identify areas of risk, potential challenges, and opportunities for improvement in the audit process.
The participation of these key team members in planning meetings allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the client’s business and audit requirements. It helps ensure that all aspects of the engagement are considered, including potential risks, regulatory requirements, and timelines. Their participation can also lead to better alignment and understanding among team members regarding the scope, objectives, and procedures of the audit.
Moreover, the involvement of the engagement partner and key team members in planning helps to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit. Their input can assist in designing a well-tailored audit approach that focuses on the areas of the client’s business with the highest risks, which can save time and resources in the long run. Additionally, their participation can help prevent potential issues from arising during the audit and can result in a higher quality of work being performed.
The involvement of the engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team in planning the audit is vital to ensure a successful audit. It allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the client’s business, facilitates better alignment among team members, and leads to a more efficient and effective audit process.
Preliminary Engagement Activities
The preliminary engagement activities that an auditor must undertake at the beginning of an audit engagement. These activities include performing procedures related to client continuance, evaluating compliance with ethical requirements, and establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement. Performing these activities helps the auditor identify and evaluate events or circumstances that may affect their ability to plan and perform the audit engagement successfully.
The preliminary engagement activities enable the auditor to plan an audit engagement while maintaining necessary independence and ability to perform the engagement. They also help identify any potential issues with management integrity or misunderstandings with the client regarding the terms of the engagement.
It’s important to note that the auditor’s consideration of client continuance and ethical requirements occurs throughout the audit engagement as conditions and circumstances change. However, performing these initial procedures at the beginning of the engagement allows the auditor to complete them before performing other significant activities for the current audit engagement. For continuing audit engagements, such initial procedures often occur shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit.
In performing the preliminary engagement activities at the beginning of the current audit engagement is crucial for the auditor to identify and address any potential issues that may affect the audit engagement’s success. It helps ensure that the auditor maintains the necessary independence, can perform the engagement, and establishes an understanding with the client regarding the terms of the engagement.
Planning Activities
The planning phase of an audit process. The audit process involves an auditor reviewing a company’s financial statements and ensuring that they are accurate and comply with accounting standards.
The first step in planning is establishing an overall audit strategy. This involves identifying the scope of the engagement, determining reporting objectives, considering factors that may impact the audit team’s efforts, and ascertaining the resources necessary to complete the engagement. This step helps the auditor determine the resources needed for specific audit areas, how to allocate those resources, when to deploy them, and how to manage them.
Once the overall audit strategy is established, the auditor can develop a detailed audit plan. The plan includes a description of the nature, timing, and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, further audit procedures at the assertion level, and other procedures required to comply with auditing standards. The audit plan is more detailed than the overall audit strategy and includes the specific audit procedures to be performed.
The auditor must update and change the overall audit strategy and audit plan as necessary during the course of the audit. Unexpected events or changes in conditions may require the auditor to modify the audit strategy and plan, and thereby adjust the planned nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
The auditor also plans the direction and supervision of the audit team and review of their work. The nature, timing, and extent of direction and supervision vary depending on factors such as the size and complexity of the entity, the area of the audit, and assessed risks of material misstatement.
For smaller entities, the overall audit strategy need not be a complex or time-consuming exercise. The entire audit may be conducted by a very small audit team, and establishing the overall audit strategy may involve a brief memorandum prepared at the completion of the previous audit, updated in the current period based on discussions with the owner-manager.
Documentation
The International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 230, which provides guidance on how an auditor should plan and document their audit work. The text outlines the requirements for documentation during an audit engagement.
The first requirement is that the auditor must document the overall audit strategy, which is a record of the key decisions made during the planning stage of the audit. This may be in the form of a memorandum that outlines the scope, timing, and conduct of the audit.
The second requirement is to document the audit plan, which is a record of the planned nature, timing, and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit procedures at the assertion level. This document also serves as a record of the proper planning of the audit procedures that can be reviewed and approved prior to their performance. Standard audit programs and checklists can be used, but they should be tailored to reflect the particular circumstances of the engagement.
The third requirement is to document any significant changes made during the audit engagement to the overall audit strategy or the audit plan and the reasons for such changes. This record should also explain resulting changes to the planned nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures and reflect the appropriate response to the significant changes occurring during the audit.
They provide guidance specific to smaller entities, suggesting that a brief memorandum may serve as the documented strategy for the audit of a smaller entity. For the audit plan, standard audit programs and checklists may be used but should be tailored to the engagement’s circumstances.
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements
The additional considerations that auditors should take into account when conducting initial audit engagements, which are audits of an entity that the auditor has not audited before. Before starting an initial audit, the auditor should perform certain procedures required by SA 220, which sets out the requirements for the acceptance of a new audit engagement. Additionally, if there has been a change of auditors, the auditor should communicate with the predecessor auditor in compliance with relevant ethical requirements.
The planning activities for an initial audit are the same as for recurring engagements, but additional considerations may need to be taken into account due to the lack of previous experience with the entity being audited. These considerations may include arrangements with the predecessor auditor to review their working papers (where not prohibited by law or regulation), major issues discussed with management during the initial selection as auditor and their communication to those charged with governance, audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding opening balances, and other procedures required by the firm’s system of quality control for initial audit engagements.
For example, the firm’s quality control system may require the involvement of another partner or senior individual to review the overall audit strategy before commencing significant audit procedures or to review reports prior to their issuance. Overall, the auditor needs to ensure that sufficient planning is done for initial audits to obtain the necessary understanding of the entity’s business and risks, and to develop an effective audit strategy and plan.
Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
The auditing standards and provides examples of matters that an auditor should consider when establishing the overall audit strategy for an engagement. The examples provided cover a broad range of matters that are applicable to many audit engagements, but not all of them will be relevant to every engagement, and the list is not necessarily complete.
The considerations are grouped into several categories:
- Characteristics of the engagement: These include factors related to the financial reporting framework, industry-specific reporting requirements, expected audit coverage, control relationships between parent and subsidiary companies, business segments to be audited, reporting currency, statutory audit requirements, reliance on internal auditors or service organizations, and the use of audit evidence obtained in previous audits.
- Reporting objectives, timing of the audit, and nature of communications: These include the entity’s timetable for reporting, meetings with management and those charged with governance to discuss the nature, timing and extent of the audit work, the type and timing of reports to be issued, communications on the status of audit work throughout the engagement, expected communications with auditors of components, expected nature and timing of communications among engagement team members, and any other expected communications with third parties.
- Significant factors, preliminary engagement activities, and knowledge gained on other engagements: These include the determination of materiality, preliminary identification of significant components and material classes of transactions, areas where there may be a higher risk of material misstatement, the impact of the assessed risk of material misstatement on direction, supervision, and review, the need to maintain a questioning mind and professional scepticism, results of previous audits, evidence of management’s commitment to sound internal control, volume of transactions, importance of internal control, significant business and industry developments, and significant changes in the financial reporting framework or legal environment affecting the entity.
- Nature, timing, and extent of resources: These include the selection of the engagement team and the assignment of audit work to team members, engagement budgeting, and considering the appropriate amount of time to set aside for areas where there may be higher risks of material misstatement.
Overall, these considerations are important for auditors to think about when planning an audit engagement. The auditor’s detailed audit plan will be influenced by many of these factors, and careful consideration of them will help ensure that the audit is conducted effectively and efficiently, with appropriate attention paid to areas where there may be a higher risk of material misstatement
Quiz: Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
1. Which of the following is the purpose of planning an audit of financial statements?
a) Identifying potential problems
b) Allocating appropriate attention to important areas
c) Properly organizing and managing the audit engagement
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
2. Planning is a one-time event in the audit process.
Answer: False
3. What factors can influence the nature and extent of planning activities?
a) Size and complexity of the entity being audited
b) Previous experience with the entity
c) Changes in circumstances during the audit engagement
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
4. Who is responsible for the overall audit strategy and audit plan?
a) Auditor
b) Engagement partner
c) Key engagement team members
d) Management of the audited entity
Answer: a)
5. Involvement of key engagement team members in the planning process is not important for an effective audit.
Answer: False
6. Which of the following are considered as preliminary engagement activities?
a) Client continuance procedures
b) Evaluation of compliance with ethical requirements
c) Establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
7. Why is it important to perform preliminary engagement activities at the beginning of an audit engagement?
a) To identify and address potential issues
b) To maintain necessary independence
c) To establish a clear understanding with the client
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
8. What are the steps involved in the planning phase of an audit process?
a) Establishing an overall audit strategy
b) Developing a detailed audit plan
c) Updating and changing the strategy and plan as necessary
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
9. Documentation is not required during an audit engagement.
Answer: False
10. What additional considerations should auditors take into account for initial audit engagements?
a) Arrangements with the predecessor auditor
b) Audit procedures for opening balances
c) Procedures required by the firm’s system of quality control
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
Additional question:
11. Which of the following is an objective of planning an audit of financial statements?
a) Ensuring compliance with ethical requirements
b) dentifying potential areas of risk
c) Determining the financial reporting framework
d) Reviewing the client’s internal control system
Answer: b)
12. Planning activities for an audit engagement are the same for initial audits and recurring engagements.
Answer: False
13. What are the key components of the planning phase in an audit process?
a) Establishing an overall audit strategy
b) Developing a detailed audit plan
c) Reviewing the client’s financial statements
d) Conducting risk assessment procedures
Answer: b)
14. Who is responsible for documenting the overall audit strategy and audit plan?
a) Engagement partner
b) Key engagement team members
c) Management of the audited entity
d) Auditor
Answer: d)
15. Why is it important to involve key engagement team members in the planning process?
a) They have a deep understanding of the client’s business and industry.
b) Their insights can help identify areas of risk and potential challenges.
c) It leads to better alignment and understanding among team members.
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
16. What are the preliminary engagement activities that an auditor must undertake?
a) Establishing the reporting objectives
b) Evaluating compliance with legal requirements
c) Identifying areas of potential misstatement
d) Reviewing the client’s financial records
Answer: c)
17. Preliminary engagement activities are only performed at the beginning of an audit engagement.
Answer: False
18. What is the purpose of documenting the overall audit strategy?
a) To communicate the audit plan to the audited entity’s management
b) To provide a record of key decisions made during the planning stage
c) To comply with regulatory requirements
d) To determine the materiality threshold for the audit
Answer: b)
19. Which factors can influence the nature and extent of planning activities?
a) The size and complexity of the audited entity
b) Changes in circumstances during the audit engagement
c) The auditor’s previous experience with the audited entity
d) All of the above
Answer: d)
20. What additional considerations should auditors take into account for initial audit engagements?
a) Reviewing the working papers of the predecessor auditor
b) Assessing the entity’s internal control system
c) Identifying significant business and industry developments
d) Performing analytical procedures on opening balances
Answer: c)
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 210
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 220
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 230
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 240
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 250
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 260
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 265
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 299
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 300
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 315
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 320
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 330
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 402
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 450
Statement On Auditing Standards – SA 500
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 501
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 505
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 510
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 520
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 530
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 540
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 560
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 570
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 580
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 600
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 610
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 620
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 700
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 701
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 705
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 706
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 710
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 720
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 800
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 805
Statement on Auditing Standards – SA 810
Statement on Auditing Standards – SAE 3400
Statement on Auditing Standards – SAE 3402
Statement on Auditing Standards – SRE 2400
Statement on Auditing Standards – SRE 2410
Statement on Auditing Standards – SRS 4400
Statement on Auditing Standards – SRS 4410
