Fundamentals of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting – Transfer Pricing

Introduction

  • In the past few decades, the world has seen large movement of capital and investment from developed and developing countries.
  • This has resulted in huge economic development, boosted trade and increases foreign direct investment in various countries.
  • Many developing countries (low – cost locations) saw boon in their manufacturing activity and become operation hub for many MNEs.
  • This also accelerated growth, innovation and created jobs.
  • Taxes are the main revenues for the economy. Once cross border activities increased, there were many instances of double-taxation and need to eliminate the same was noticed.
  • Progressively, Governments entered bilateral tax agreements often called as Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (‘DTAA”) with other countries for elimination of double taxation and resolution of disputes.
  • The global MNEs started adopting sophistication in tax planning thereby reducing the overall tax burden of the MNE.
  • Sometimes these tax planning methods were very aggressive, touching the boundaries of exploiting legal arbitrage which often leads to Base Erosion and profit shifting (‘BEPS’).

Adverse effect of BEPS

  • BEPS refers to tax planning that exploit gaps in the domestic laws and mismatches in tax rules to make profit disappear for tax purposes or to shift profits to locations where there is little or no economic activity but the taxes are low. This has adverse effect on the economy for many reasons including:
Adverse Effect
Adverse Effect 1

Why there is disparity?

  • Taxation is the core of a country’s sovereignty. These domestic tax laws of each country lead to gaps and mismatches which are broadly discussed below:
Disparity

BEPS action plan

  • The OECD published a report addressing the BEPS issues by publishing draft Action Plans (‘AP) in July 2013 which came to finality in October 2015.
  • It has 15 APs to address BEPS in a comprehensive manner and set a deadline for implementation.
  • The action plans are based on three main principles:
Actionplan

BEPS overview of Action Plan

Overview
Overview 1

Question

Why there is often tax arbitrage between countries?

  1. Domestic laws may not take in to account the effect of its laws on other countries and lack of coherence and differential tax treatment may cause tax arbitrage
  2. Tax arbitrage happens when MNEs try to evade taxes
  3. Tax arbitrage happens because countries want to preserve its tax sovereignty

Answer a.

Question

In the context of BEPS, what is meant by coherence?

  1. Domestic and international law should relate to both income and economic activity that generate it
  2. Identifying risks areas, and focus on audit strategies between taxing countries
  3. Tax deductible payment of one person becomes income inclusion by the recipient and thereby preventing double non-deduction

Answer c.

Coherence means tax deductible payment of one person becomes income inclusion by the recipient which is taken care in domestic law and may be difficult to practice in international law thereby paving way for double non-deduction.

Mutual Agreement Procedure

Mutual Agreement Procedure Mutual Agreement Procedure (‘MAP’) is a procedure set out in most treaties which permit designated Government representatives to work together to resolve international tax disputes including issues involving double taxation, questions regarding residential status, tax recovery etc. MAP is used to eliminate double taxation that can arise from transfer …
Read More

Additional reporting by Multinational companies – Transfer pricing

Additional reporting by Multinational companies – Transfer pricing The OECD had devised many action plans to combat BEPS. OECD also recommended a three-tier documentation approach for transfer pricing under Action Plan 13. Three tier documentation Advantages of three tier reporting Elements of CbC and Master File reporting requirement and related matters have been incorporated …
Read More

Anti-Avoidance measures in certain jurisdictions – Transfer pricing

Anti-Avoidance measures in certain jurisdictions – Transfer pricing Specific anti-avoidance measures in respect of transactions with persons located in Notified Jurisdictional area was introduced in the Act under sec 94AWe have seen in earlier sections that transactions with the AEs are subject to transfer pricing provisions.This is generally sufficient to cover …
Read More

Penalties for non-compliance – Transfer Pricing

Penalties for non-compliance – Transfer Pricing The Act has prescribed strict penalties for non-compliance in terms of non-disclosure or incorrect disclosure Question International group shall maintain information and documents in Master file when Consolidated group revenue of the International group is (as reflected in Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Group) is More than …
Read More

Introduction to Transfer Pricing

Introduction to Transfer Pricing Transfer Price “Transfer Price” is the price at which an enterprise charges for its transaction within its group entitiesInternational transaction involves more than one tax jurisdiction, and due to disparity in tax rates and method of computing income, the parties may try to adjust the transfer pricesSince the …
Read More

Limitation of interest deductions – transfer pricing

Limitation of interest deductions – transfer pricing Introduction Popularly known as ‘Thin Capitalization Rules’, this provision intends to cap the interest that can be paid to the AEs in case of borrowings.Generally, debt is a preferred instrument to provide funds to the subsidiary or group company rather than equity due to the …
Read More

Subscribe to our News Letter

Get periodical updates from us

Subscribe to our News Letter

I hope you enjoy reading this blog